When I first heard aboutArctic Apples ’ GM apple — genetically modify to not brown when bruised or swerve — andJ.R. Simplot ’s GM Innate potato — genetically qualify to have fewer black spots , not brown as quickly and bring about less of the carcinogenic compoundacrylamidewhen cooked at high temperatures ( aka fried)—I typeface - palmed . The concept of GM crop was primitively sell to us on the base that they would have a higher return , call for fewer input and be more drought - resistant and therefore will be the answer to feeding the world . Now we have an apple engineered for cosmetic purposes and a potato that will let us to … I ’m sorry … frymore potatoes .
A North Carolina State University and the University of Minnesota cogitation found consumers are uncoerced to admit GM intellectual nourishment and foods acquire usingnanotechnologyif these intellectual nourishment presentnutritional or solid food - safety benefits . I am about to make a enceinte affirmation here : I ’m not entirely anti - GM — and this is the first meter I ’ve admitted that in authorship — rather I ’m anti- the negative effects of GM , be they to the environment , to wellness or as a result of the methods used to bring about these crops . I think every GMO necessitate to be evaluated on its own individual merits , so I ’m not anti - GM apples or potatoes decent off the bat ( but I definitely want to see them labeled ) . even so , why are people so ill - inform about their food for thought that they ca n’t eat an apple or cook a potato after it ’s browned ? That just get down me . And if fried potatoes are bad for you because they release minor amounts of a carcinogen , do n’t rust so many deep-fried potatoes ! Even GM potatoes , when fry , will not be considered a health food , just like organic Pop Tarts are n’t wellness solid food just because they ’re constituent .
Looking at it from a intellectual nourishment - waste perspective , rather than a consumer - education perspective , maybe we can cut back some wasted food here , and that ’s an interesting concept .
No Brown Apples Here
The Arctic Apples website says : “ We all love apples ! Until they turn browned , that is . Arctic apples are everything you love about apples , without the ‘ yuck ’ gene that you do n’t . ( Now if we could just get rid of the seeds ! ) ” reserve up . get ’s get disembarrass of the seeds so that our food for thought no longer resembles the stuff establish in nature at all ?
I have news program for people who eat apple : orchard apple tree turn chocolate-brown when they are exposed to air . Malus pumila brown as a resultant of achemical reactionbetween atomic number 8 and the polyphenol oxidase and phenolic compounds present in apples . These thing mix and the pulp turn an wretched color , but the taste and quality continue . Eat your apple quicker if you do n’t want it to sour brown , or toss your slice in some Citrus limon succus .
TheArctic Granny and Arctic Goldenvarieties will be commercially available next yr . There ’s no word on the cost yet . I hope these will be easy to make out from unconstipated Granny and Golden miscellanea because , no doubt , Arctic will require to brand its intersection and the no - browning traits , because it saysthat ’s what client want . It ’s clearly not what all consumers require , though , because big food companies , like McDonald ’s and Gerber , do n’t design to use the apples and major apple - growing group , including USApple and the Northwest Horticultural Council , are opposed to glacial apples , too . friend of the Earth and 11 other organizationsalso necessitate other profligate - food giants to not source the GM apple .
I express mirth when understand Indiana farm broadcaster andHoosier Ag TodayfounderGary Truitt ’s web log : “ I hope one day the fast food sector willgrow a pairand distinguish these radicals to go away . ” Yeah , take that , you nature - bank radicals ! ( I jest . Truitt would totally dislike me , too . )
But if what you ’re after is an apple that does n’t brown and is not GM , that ’s out there , too ! TheOpal appleis grown across Europe , but in the U.S. , it ’s only uprise in Washington , so it ’s really hard to find in storehouse . Maybe if requirement were to increase , so would provide .
And About the Potatoes
Starting this twelvemonth , you ’ll be able-bodied to regain three varieties — Russet Burbank , Ranger Russet and Atlantic — of Innate Solanum tuberosum in food service , but they will not yet be in grocery storage . It ’s estimate they could save400 million pounds of Solanum tuberosum wasteeach year in the U.S. See above for my apple - browning rant , and apply it here , too .
McDonald ’s , apparently reacting to consumer concerns , has already said no to the GM potatoes . The Innate potatoes are n’t the first GM potatoes to come around . In the mid-90s , Monsanto ’s New Leaf potatoeswere modified with theBacillus thuringensis(Bt ) gene , promising electric resistance to the detest Colorado Irish potato mallet ( my curse ! ) . They did n’t take off because of supply and craw - transition issues , and they were no longer sold as of 2001 .
J.R. Simplot is work on other GM Irish potato that will also have electrical resistance to later - blight disease and offer good storability .
Make Produce , Not Waste
With all thing , I endeavor to look at both side , and these apples and potatoes are no dissimilar . Maybe Arctic Apples will make really picky consumers eat more fresh fruits , and maybe they will leave to less apple waste . Likewise , it would be squeamish to have less otiose potatoes , too .
Of of course , as a sodbuster who harvests unattractive produce alongside its perfect - looking counterparts , I ’d prefer that people just learn to accept morecosmetically imperfect foods . I ’d also prefer that people get to know the Farmer and orchardists who grow their food so they can inquire , “ Are these genetically modified ? ”
« More The News Hog »
