An Alameda jury in the suit of Pilliod et al . v. Monsanto Company returned a verdict of $ 2.055 billion in favour of a married man and wife with non - Hodgkin lymphoma , ordering Monsanto to pay $ 55 million in compensatory damages and $ 2 billion in punitive damages ( $ 1 billion each for Mr. and Mrs. Pilliod ) for failing to warn consumer that vulnerability to Roundup weed killer causes non - Hodgkin lymphoma ( NHL ) .
The verdict is the third in a dustup against Monsanto ( now Bayer ) . Combined with the first two legal defeats ( the Johnson v. Monsanto verdict of $ 289.2 M and the Hardeman v. Monsanto verdict of $ 80 M ) , verdict against Monsanto in the Roundup Crab litigation now stand at $ 2.424 billion with 13,400 cases still pending in state and Union court . ( Johnson ’s verdict was later reduced to $ 78.5 M but his verdict is on appeal . )
Alva and Alberta Pilliod , a Livermore , California couple in their 70s , used Monsanto ’s Roundup weed cause of death together for more than 30 years to landscape their home and other properties . They were both name with the same type of NHL , diffuse turgid B - cellular phone lymphoma ( DLBCL ) , associated with Roundup picture . In 2011 , Alva was name with systemic NHL in many of his bones , which spread out to his renal pelvis and rachis . Alberta was diagnosed with NHL learning ability cancer in 2015 .
In their Roundup cancer case , the couple attribute their cancer diagnoses on pic to Roundup and its dynamic constituent , glyphosate , and accused Monsanto of fraudulently representing that Roundup is good despite scientific evidence linking photograph to NHL .
After approximately 7 weeks of trial proceedings , the jury found that picture to Roundup induce the Pilliods to develop NHL and that Monsanto failed to warn of this severe wellness hazard . The panel also found that Monsanto do with malice , oppression or hoax and should be punished for its conduct . get through here for more data on the court eccentric .
Bayer disappointedBayer shares it is disappointed with the panel ’s decision and will invoke the verdict in this case , " which conflict directly with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ’s interim registration review decision secrete just last month , the consensus among lead wellness governor worldwide that glyphosate - based products can be used safely and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic , and the 40 years of extensive scientific inquiry on which their favorable conclusion are based .
" We have great sympathy for Mr. and Mrs. Pilliod , but the grounds in this case was clear that both have long histories of illnesses know to be satisfying risk factors for non - Hodgkin ’s lymphoma ( NHL ) , most NHL has no known cause , and there is not reliable scientific evidence to close that glyphosate - based weedkiller were the ' but for ' suit of their illnesses as the jury was ask to find in this showcase . “Read the full statement from Bayer here .
